Interest of D.C.
This text of 2014 ND 219 (Interest of D.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/18/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2014 ND 219
In the Interest of D.C.
Vidyashree Chikkarmananjegowda, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.C., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20140416
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mary E. J. Jensen, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 1727, Jamestown, N.D. 58402-1727, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Lee M. Grossman, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, N.D. 58072, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of D.C.
[¶1] D.C. appeals from an order allowing the State Hospital to involuntarily treat her with medication until January 19, 2015. D.C. argues the district court abused its discretion in granting the State Hospital’s request for a six-day continuance of the medication hearing and the court’s order to involuntarily treat her with medication is clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm the order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 ND 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-dc-nd-2014.