Interest of D. K. W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Interest of D. K. W. v. State

354 So. 2d 1274, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14965

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1978

DocketNo. 77-1307

StatusPublished

This text of 354 So. 2d 1274 (Interest of D. K. W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interest of D. K. W. v. State, 354 So. 2d 1274, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14965 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of delinquency based upon a finding of ungoverna-bility for the second time. The petition upon which the proceedings were based was not signed by a state attorney as required by Section 39.05(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Moreover, the petition failed to allege that D. K. W. had previously been adjudicated as an ungovernable child and that the proceedings could result in an adjudication of delinquency. Therefore, upon the authority of D. T. H. v. State, 348 So.2d 1155 (Fla.1977), the order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the rationale of that case.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of delinquency based upon a finding of ungoverna-bility for the second time. The petition upon which the proceedings were based was not signed by a state attorney as required by Section 39.05(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Moreover, the petition failed to allege that D. K. W. had previously been adjudicated as an ungovernable child and that the proceedings could result in an adjudication of delinquency. Therefore, upon the authority of D. T. H. v. State, 348 So.2d 1155 (Fla.1977), the order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the rationale of that case.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 So. 2d 1274, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-d-k-w-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack