Interest of D. E. I. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Interest of D. E. I. v. State

264 So. 2d 857, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6567

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 1972·No. No. 72-206·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent because he was found to be in possession of a firearm. This appeal was duly prosecuted and urges insufficiency of the evidence to support a finding that the juvenile had possession of the firearm. With commendable candor, the State concedes the lack of evidence to show possession in the juvenile and confesses error. See: Lawson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 683.

We therefore dispense with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and reverse the adjudication determining the juvenile to be delinquent, with directions to discharge him from said proceeding.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent because he was found to be in possession of a firearm. This appeal was duly prosecuted and urges insufficiency of the evidence to support a finding that the juvenile had possession of the firearm. With commendable candor, the State concedes the lack of evidence to show possession in the juvenile and confesses error. See: Lawson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 683.

We therefore dispense with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and reverse the adjudication determining the juvenile to be delinquent, with directions to discharge him from said proceeding.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Interest of D. E. I. v. State, 264 So. 2d 857, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6567 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

264 So. 2d 857 (Interest of D. E. I. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related