Interest of A.N.P.
Opinion
Filed 3/15/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2012 ND 46
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Joseph Anthony Carpenter, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20110283
Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd Ronald Erickson (submitted on brief), State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, ND 58577-1108, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow (submitted on brief), 411 N. 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Carpenter
No. 20110283
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Joseph Anthony Carpenter appeals a district court amended criminal judgment entered after this Court remanded his case for resentencing. Carpenter argues the district court abused its discretion by sentencing him as a habitual offender. The district court did not abuse its discretion, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2012 ND 52 (Interest of A.N.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.