Interest of A.F.L.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Interest of A.F.L.

2017 ND 164, 898 N.W.2d 406, 2017 WL 2962823, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 176

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 12, 2017

Docket20170203

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 164 (Interest of A.F.L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interest of A.F.L., 2017 ND 164, 898 N.W.2d 406, 2017 WL 2962823, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 176 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] B.W. appealed a district court’s order terminating his parental rights to A.F.L. On appeal, B.W. argues the district court was clearly erroneous in finding B.W. abandoned A.F.L, and that it was in A.F.L.’s best interest to terminate B.W.’s parental rights. Because the district court’s findings were not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] B.W. appealed a district court’s order terminating his parental rights to A.F.L. On appeal, B.W. argues the district court was clearly erroneous in finding B.W. abandoned A.F.L, and that it was in A.F.L.’s best interest to terminate B.W.’s parental rights. Because the district court’s findings were not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 ND 164, 898 N.W.2d 406, 2017 WL 2962823, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interest-of-afl-nd-2017.