Interdiction of Watkins

41 So. 243, 116 La. 1019, 1906 La. LEXIS 618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Interdiction of Watkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 La. 1017
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 21, 1906·No. No. 16,158·Published

Opinion

PROVO STY, J.

The relator filed a petition for the interdiction of his uncle, and applied to be appointed his curator. The judgment ordered a family meeting to be held, and, same having been held, the relator opposed the homologation of the proceedings and recused the judge. The judge referred the recusation to a judge ad hoc, and the latter ■overruled same. The relator moved for a. suspensive appeal, and, same having been ■denied, applied to this court for a mandamus, .and at the same time filed the present application for prohibition and certiorari as .ancillary to the mandamus proceeding. The mandamus having been refused by a decree this day handed dowp, (41 South. 242),1 the present application must also be denied.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interdiction of Watkins, 41 So. 243, 116 La. 1019, 1906 La. LEXIS 618 (La. 1906).

41 So. 243 (Interdiction of Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interdiction of Watkins
41 So. 242 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)