Intercounty Associates v. Ball
This text of 236 N.E.2d 165 (Intercounty Associates v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: Although the State Bingo Commission should have made a statement of the standard upon which its determination was based, or better, have provided by promulgated rule the applicable standards, the evidence is more than sufficient to indicate that, whatever standard is used, the landlord’s return was ample even under the reduced rentals imposed. Therefore, a remission to the commission is unnecessary (Matter of Fink v. Cole, 1 N Y 2d 48 [1956]).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 N.E.2d 165, 21 N.Y.2d 859, 288 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intercounty-associates-v-ball-ny-1968.