Intercontinental Transportation Co. v. States Marine Lines, Inc.
297 F.2d 249
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 8, 1961·No. No. 102, Docket 27072·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The order is so clearly correct that it would have been affirmed at the conclusion of the arguments, except for a question as to whether it was an appealable order. Farr & Co. v. Cia Intercontinental De Navegacion, 2 Cir., 243 F.2d 342 disposes of that question. Order affirmed on Judge Murphy’s opinion, 200 F.Supp. 88.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Intercontinental Transportation Co. v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 297 F.2d 249 (2d Cir. 1961).
297 F.2d 249 (Intercontinental Transportation Co. v. States Marine Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
County of Durham v. Richards & Associates, Inc.
742 F.2d 811 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
Chatham Shipping Company, Warwick Corporation and Tsakalotos Navigation Corp., Libelants-Appellees v. Fertex Steamship Corporation
352 F.2d 291 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Intercontinental Transportation Co., Inc., Owner of the S.S. Natalie v. States Marine Lines, Inc., and Arrow Steamship Co., Inc.
297 F.2d 249 (Second Circuit, 1961)