Intercoastal Drydock, Inc. v. State Road Department

203 So. 2d 19, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4390
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 3, 1967
DocketNo. 66-1028
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 203 So. 2d 19 (Intercoastal Drydock, Inc. v. State Road Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Intercoastal Drydock, Inc. v. State Road Department, 203 So. 2d 19, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

CHARLES CARROLL, Chief Judge.

The appellant, one of the defendants in a case of eminent domain, held a lease on a parcel of land owned by the defendant Elmore Daniels. The lease was made in 1961 and was for a period of ten years. The appellant had operated a business thereon from inception of the lease.

On trial the jury made an award of $197,705 for the property taken, plus moving expense of $3,602.50 to the owner, and found no special or “business damages” for the lessee. On this appeal, the lessee, contending it was entitled to receive damages to its business, assigned as error certain rulings on evidence relating to its income or profit from its business. Those assignments and the arguments presented thereon are without merit. This is so because, as averred in the appellant’s answer and stated in appellant’s brief, all of the leased premises on which its business was located were taken on condemnation. Under the applicable law (§ 73.071(3) (b) Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) business damages are recoverable by an owner (or a lessee) only for a business (of more than five years’ standing) “located upon adjoining lands owned or held by such party.” See State Road Department v. Bramlett, Fla.1966, 189 So.2d 481, 483; Guarria v. State Road Department of Florida, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 5, 6. In such circumstance the lessee is relegated to receiving from the jury’s award the value of his leasehold interest to be determined and apportioned by the trial judge, as provided for in § 73.101 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See Carter v. State Road Department, Fla.1966, 189 So.2d 793.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jamesson v. Downtown Development Authority
322 So. 2d 510 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 So. 2d 19, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intercoastal-drydock-inc-v-state-road-department-fladistctapp-1967.