Interco Systems, Inc. v. Gager

162 A.D.2d 1026, 559 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9806

This text of 162 A.D.2d 1026 (Interco Systems, Inc. v. Gager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Interco Systems, Inc. v. Gager, 162 A.D.2d 1026, 559 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The court properly granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and properly denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to establish that it suffered any damages from defendant’s alleged breach of the employment agreement; therefore, the liquidated damages

[1027]*1027clause is punitive, unconscionable and unenforceable (see, Truck Rent-A-Center v Puritan Farms 2nd, 41 NY2d 420, 424-425; cf., Viaggio & Sons v City of New York, 114 AD2d 939). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Truck Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Puritan Farms 2nd, Inc.
361 N.E.2d 1015 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
M. Viaggio & Sons, Inc. v. City of New York
114 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 A.D.2d 1026, 559 N.Y.S.2d 196, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interco-systems-inc-v-gager-nyappdiv-1990.