Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade

918 A.2d 270, 281 Conn. 918
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 28, 2007
Docket17848
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 918 A.2d 270 (Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade, 918 A.2d 270, 281 Conn. 918 (Colo. 2007).

Opinion

918 A.2d 270 (2007)
281 Conn. 918

INTERCITY DEVELOPMENT, LLC
v.
Joao ANDRADE et al.

No. 17848.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 28, 2007.

Robert E. Ghent, Waterbury, in support of the petition.

David P. Friedman and Marcy Tench Stovall, Bridgeport, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn.App. 608, 901 A.2d 731 (2006), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment for the plaintiff on its recovery on its mechanic's lien and attorney's fees?"

*271 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17848.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade
942 A.2d 1028 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
918 A.2d 270, 281 Conn. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intercity-development-llc-v-andrade-conn-2007.