Intercity Carnival Co. v. Illions
This text of 136 Misc. 56 (Intercity Carnival Co. v. Illions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to appellant, and motion to open default denied, with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated.
The application to open the default was not made until more than two years after the entry of the judgment, knowledge of which was had by the defendant and his attorney. The motion, therefore, was not made with due diligence. (New York Mun. Ct. Code [Laws of 3915, chap. 279], § 129, subd. 2.)
The failure to give notice adjourning the case was a mere irregularity and did not render the judgment void.
All concur; present, Cropsey, MacCrate and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 Misc. 56, 239 N.Y.S. 128, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intercity-carnival-co-v-illions-nyappterm-1929.