Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Legros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Legros

205 A.D.2d 537, 614 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 537 (Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Legros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Legros, 205 A.D.2d 537, 614 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated October 1, 1992, which denied the petitioner’s motion to vacate an arbitration award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner moved to vacate the arbitration award under CPLR 7511 (b) (2) (iii) on the ground that the arbitration agreement had not been complied with. However, such relief is only available to a party "who neither participated in the arbitration nor was served with a notice of intention to arbitrate” (CPLR 7511 [b] [2]). Although the petitioner did not participate in the arbitration, it concedes that it was served with a notice of intention to arbitrate. Thus the petitioner is not entitled to the relief requested, and the Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner’s motion on that basis. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated October 1, 1992, which denied the petitioner’s motion to vacate an arbitration award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner moved to vacate the arbitration award under CPLR 7511 (b) (2) (iii) on the ground that the arbitration agreement had not been complied with. However, such relief is only available to a party "who neither participated in the arbitration nor was served with a notice of intention to arbitrate” (CPLR 7511 [b] [2]). Although the petitioner did not participate in the arbitration, it concedes that it was served with a notice of intention to arbitrate. Thus the petitioner is not entitled to the relief requested, and the Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner’s motion on that basis. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Lawrence and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 537, 614 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interboro-mutual-indemnity-insurance-v-legros-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack