Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Callender

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Callender

288 A.D.2d 474, 732 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11356

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 26, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated February 23, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.

The Supreme Court should have granted the petition to stay arbitration of the uninsured motorist claim. Henry Callender failed to provide the petitioner with notice of his uninsured motorist claim as soon as practicable, as required by his insurance policy (see, Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v Mancuso, 93 NY2d 487; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v Bernardine, [475] 266 AD2d 543; Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v Montopoli, 262 AD2d 647).

In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the petitioner’s remaining contentions. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated February 23, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.

The Supreme Court should have granted the petition to stay arbitration of the uninsured motorist claim. Henry Callender failed to provide the petitioner with notice of his uninsured motorist claim as soon as practicable, as required by his insurance policy (see, Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v Mancuso, 93 NY2d 487; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v Bernardine, [475] 266 AD2d 543; Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. v Montopoli, 262 AD2d 647).

In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the petitioner’s remaining contentions. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Callender, 288 A.D.2d 474, 732 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

288 A.D.2d 474 (Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Callender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related