Interboro General Hospital v. Allcity Insurance

119 A.D.2d 633, 501 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55560
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 14, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 119 A.D.2d 633 (Interboro General Hospital v. Allcity Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Interboro General Hospital v. Allcity Insurance, 119 A.D.2d 633, 501 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— In an action brought under the no-fault provisions of the Insurance Law (§ 5101 et seq.), the defendant insurers appeal, (1) as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Widlitz, J.), entered October 19, 1984, as awarded the plaintiff additional attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,000 as a "fee upon a fee”, or a fee for time spent in substantiating its counsel fees, and (2) an order of the same court dated April 22, 1985, which denied their motion for reargument.

Judgment reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, and additional attorney’s fees denied.

Appeal from the order dated April 22, 1985 dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument.

The appellants are awarded one bill of costs.

Counsel fees are not recoverable absent an express statutory or contractual provision therefor (see, e.g., City of Buffalo v Clement Co., 28 NY2d 241, 262-263; Equitable Lbr. Corp. v IPA Land Dev. Corp., 38 NY2d 516). In the instant case, where the claims arose out of accidents which occurred in 1978, recovery of attorney’s fees is limited by Insurance Law § 5106 (a) and the regulations promulgated thereunder and set forth in 11 NYCRR 65.16 (c) (8). Those regulations do not authorize the award of a "fee upon a fee”, and, therefore, that part of the judgment under review must be reversed (see, 11 NYCRR 65.16 [c] [8] [x]; Hempstead Gen. Hosp. v Allstate Ins. Co., 106 AD2d 429, affd 64 NY2d 958). Matter of Fresh Meadows Med. [634]*634Assoc. (Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.) (49 NY2d 93) is not applicable to the instant case, as that case involved neither the amended statute nor the regulations promulgated pursuant to it. Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mid-Island Hospital v. Empire Mutual Insurance
120 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D.2d 633, 501 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interboro-general-hospital-v-allcity-insurance-nyappdiv-1986.