Interbel Trading, Inc. v. Editorial Caracas, C.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Interbel Trading, Inc. v. Editorial Caracas, C.A.

507 So. 2d 800, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1348, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8367

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 27, 1987

DocketNo. 4-86-0769

StatusPublished

This text of 507 So. 2d 800 (Interbel Trading, Inc. v. Editorial Caracas, C.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interbel Trading, Inc. v. Editorial Caracas, C.A., 507 So. 2d 800, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1348, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8367 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error with respect to the main appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. As for the cross appeal, we agree with appel-lee that it was entitled to prejudgment interest; and we reverse the trial court’s denial of same and remand with direction to award it from January 81, 1982. See Argonaut Insurance Company v. May Plumbing Company, 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985), approving Bergen Brunswig Corporation v. State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 415 So.2d 765 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (misappropriation and misuse of funds provided pursuant to a contractual arrangement); Trend Coin Company v. Honeywell, Inc., 487 So.2d 1029 (Fla.1986) (intentional misrepresentation as to a burglar alarm system, negligent design, negligent installation and service, and breach of contract); Getelman v. Levey, 481 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (fraud and breach of fiduciary duty).

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and FEDER, RICHARD Y., Associate Judge, concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error with respect to the main appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. As for the cross appeal, we agree with appel-lee that it was entitled to prejudgment interest; and we reverse the trial court’s denial of same and remand with direction to award it from January 81, 1982. See Argonaut Insurance Company v. May Plumbing Company, 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985), approving Bergen Brunswig Corporation v. State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 415 So.2d 765 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (misappropriation and misuse of funds provided pursuant to a contractual arrangement); Trend Coin Company v. Honeywell, Inc., 487 So.2d 1029 (Fla.1986) (intentional misrepresentation as to a burglar alarm system, negligent design, negligent installation and service, and breach of contract); Getelman v. Levey, 481 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (fraud and breach of fiduciary duty).

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and FEDER, RICHARD Y., Associate Judge, concur,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 So. 2d 800, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1348, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interbel-trading-inc-v-editorial-caracas-ca-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack