Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United States

15 Cust. Ct. 425, 1945 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1061
United States Customs Court·Decided September 10, 1945·No. No. 6217; Entry No. 700970, etc.·Published

Opinion

Cole, Judge:

In a written stipulation filed September 6, 1945, the parties have agreed that the issues involved in these appeals for re-appraisement of wool wearing apparel are the same as those decided in United States v. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc., 32 C. C. P. A. 187, C. A. D. 305, and that the record in the said case be incorporated herein.

United States v. Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc., supra, found cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (f)), to be the proper basis for appraisement, and held that the so-called British purchase tax described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act, 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48,” was not an item to be included in the “usual general expenses” contemplated within subdivision (2) of section 402 (f)j supra, and therefore not to be calculated in determining such statutory value.

On the agreement of counsel that the several elements entering into the statutory cost of production of the items in question is equal to the appraised values thereof, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, I hold such values to be the cost of production, section 402 (f), supra, which I find to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United States, 15 Cust. Ct. 425, 1945 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1061 (cusc 1945).

15 Cust. Ct. 425 (Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.