Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 158, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 876
United States Customs Court·Decided September 7, 1949·No. No. 53539; protest 145277-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that, the 21 drawings, which were found in excess in entry 322025, are original drawings in pen and ink, not articles of utility or for industrial use, and not made by stenciling or any mechanical process. It was further stipulated that the case be submitted on the stipulation and the official papers. The official papers include a consignee’s affidavit, Form 3309, filed in accordance with section 10.48, Customs Regulations of 1943, but it was conceded at the trial that the artist’s certificate, Form 253, was not filed as to the drawings. The court held that compliance [159]*159with the regulations issued under paragraph 1807 is not a condition precedent to free entry thereunder. (Wm. Vixseboxse v. United States, 4 Cust. Ct. 41, C. D. 280, and Anderson Art Galleries v. United States, 63 Treas. Dec. 495, T. D. 46258, followed.) In view of the stipulation, therefore, it was held that the merchandise was entitled to free entry under paragraph 1807, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 158, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 876 (cusc 1949).

23 Cust. Ct. 158 (Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vixseboxse v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 41 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)