Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 228, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1297
United States Customs Court·Decided January 20, 1949·No. No. 52835; protest 63413-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in John Barr v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See John Barr v. United States, 324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entry 824283. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 228, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1297 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 228 (Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barr v. United States
324 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Barr v. United States
11 Cust. Ct. 88 (U.S. Customs Court, 1943)