Inter-County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bozarth

117 So. 107, 95 Fla. 939
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 So. 107 (Inter-County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bozarth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inter-County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bozarth, 117 So. 107, 95 Fla. 939 (Fla. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In an action of assumpsit on common counts for money payable for goods, wares and merchandise bargained and sold, for material furnished and for labor done and performed, there was a trial on a plea of never was indebted, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the full amount of the claim with interest. The defendant took writ of error. Even if the evidence be considered as *940 legally sufficient to show liability of the defendant on the ground that it authorized or ratified an indebtedness to the plaintiff, there is not sufficient evidence of an agreed price or of the reasonable value of the items constituting the alleged indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff. See Chase & Co. v. Miller, 81 Fla. 472, 88 So. 313; C. H. & N. Ry. Co. v. Burwell, 56 Fla. 217, 48 So. 213.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kilgore Seed Co. v. Pearce
103 So. 2d 112 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 107, 95 Fla. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inter-county-telephone-telegraph-co-v-bozarth-fla-1928.