Inter-County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bozarth

117 So. 107, 95 Fla. 939
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In an action of assumpsit on common counts for money payable for goods, wares and merchandise bargained and sold, for material furnished and for labor done and performed, there was a trial on a plea of never was indebted, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the full amount of the claim with interest. The defendant took writ of error. Even if the evidence be considered as *940 legally sufficient to show liability of the defendant on the ground that it authorized or ratified an indebtedness to the plaintiff, there is not sufficient evidence of an agreed price or of the reasonable value of the items constituting the alleged indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff. See Chase & Co. v. Miller, 81 Fla. 472, 88 So. 313; C. H. & N. Ry. Co. v. Burwell, 56 Fla. 217, 48 So. 213.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inter-County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bozarth, 117 So. 107, 95 Fla. 939 (Fla. 1928).

117 So. 107 (Inter-County Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bozarth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kilgore Seed Co. v. Pearce
103 So. 2d 112 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)