Inter-City Tire and Auto Center, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank

926 N.E.2d 596, 14 N.Y.3d 824, 900 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 446
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 6, 2010
DocketMo. No. 2010-165
StatusPublished

This text of 926 N.E.2d 596 (Inter-City Tire and Auto Center, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inter-City Tire and Auto Center, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank, 926 N.E.2d 596, 14 N.Y.3d 824, 900 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 446 (N.Y. 2010).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying a motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismiss *825 ing the appeal, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]). Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
926 N.E.2d 596, 14 N.Y.3d 824, 900 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inter-city-tire-and-auto-center-inc-v-sterling-national-bank-ny-2010.