Inter-City Tire and Auto Center, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Inter-City Tire and Auto Center, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank

926 N.E.2d 596, 14 N.Y.3d 824, 900 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 446

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 2010·No. Mo. No. 2010-165·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying a motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismiss *825 ing the appeal, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]). Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying a motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismiss *825 ing the appeal, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]). Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.

Inter-City Tire and Auto Center, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank, 926 N.E.2d 596, 14 N.Y.3d 824, 900 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 446 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

926 N.E.2d 596 (Inter-City Tire and Auto Center, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.