Inter-Cassette (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Laolagi

Ninth Circuit

Inter-Cassette (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Laolagi

38 F.3d 1218, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36932, 1994 WL 574158

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1994

Docket93-55353

StatusPublished

This text of 38 F.3d 1218 (Inter-Cassette (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Laolagi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Inter-Cassette (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Laolagi, 38 F.3d 1218, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36932, 1994 WL 574158 (9th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

38 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

INTER-CASSETTE (HONG KONG) LTD.; Trans Pacific Marketing,
Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jon LAOLAGI, aka: John Stallion; dba: John Stallion
Productions; Mark Carriere, aka: Mark Curtis;
Multimedia Dist. Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-55353.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1994.
Oct. 19, 1994.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, and TANNER,* District Judge.

ORDER

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Appellees are awarded attorneys' fees and double costs. We remand this issue to the district court for setting fees and costs.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

*

Honorable Jack E. Tanner, United States District Judge, Western District of Washington, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI