Intel Corporation v. TIN Inc. F/K/A Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 2012
Docket03-11-00534-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Intel Corporation v. TIN Inc. F/K/A Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation (Intel Corporation v. TIN Inc. F/K/A Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Intel Corporation v. TIN Inc. F/K/A Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-11-00534-CV

Intel Corporation, Appellant



v.



TIN Inc. f/k/a Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-11-002207, HONORABLE GUS J. STRAUSS JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



Appellant Intel Corporation appealed from an interlocutory order granting a temporary injunction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2011). Appellant has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal stating that the parties have executed a settlement agreement that fully resolves the dispute between them and that pursuant to that agreement appellee filed in the trial court an agreed motion for nonsuit with prejudice and to dissolve the temporary injunction. On December 22, 2011, the trial court signed an agreed order dismissing the underlying cause of action. The trial court's dismissal of the underlying action automatically dissolved the temporary injunction, see General Land Office v. OXY U.S.A., Inc., 789 S.W.2d 569, 571 (Tex. 1990), rendering the issues in this appeal moot. We therefore grant the motion and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.



_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 6, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GENERAL LAND OFFICE OF THE STATE OF TEX. v. Oxy USA, Inc.
789 S.W.2d 569 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Intel Corporation v. TIN Inc. F/K/A Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intel-corporation-v-tin-inc-fka-temple-inland-fore-texapp-2012.