Integrity Trust Co. v. Taylor

17 Pa. D. & C. 721
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedOctober 18, 1932
DocketNo. 1; No. 5027
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Pa. D. & C. 721 (Integrity Trust Co. v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Integrity Trust Co. v. Taylor, 17 Pa. D. & C. 721 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1932).

Opinion

Parry, J.,

— The writ of attachment cannot be -quashed as no irregularity appears on the face of the record. Nor does it appear that the attachment can now be dissolved on the ground that the fund attached is of the character entitled to the protection of the Act of April 15,1845, P. L. 459. We think the application premature, as the plaintiff cannot be summarily deprived of either the right to interrogate the garnishee or to have a jury pass upon disputed questions of fact that may arise.

The rule to show cause why the writ of attachment should not be quashed or dissolved is continued pending the filing of interrogatories.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Pa. D. & C. 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/integrity-trust-co-v-taylor-pactcomplphilad-1932.