Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC v. Seroclinix Corporation

District Court, S.D. California·Decided January 24, 2025·No. 3:22-cv-00785·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 INTEGRITY MEDICAL PRODUCT Case No. 22-cv-00785-BAS-BLM SOLUTIONS, LLC, 12 ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ Plaintiff, 13 JOINT MOTION (ECF No. 56) v. 14 SEROCLINIX CORPORATION, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 This case arises from a contractual dispute between Plaintiff Integrity Medical 19 Product Solutions, LLC (“Integrity”) and Defendants Seroclinix Corporation, a Canadian 20 corporation (“Seroclinix Canada”), and Seroclinix Corporation, a Delaware corporation 21 (“Seroclinix Delaware”). Before the Court are the parties’ Joint Motion to (1) withdraw 22 Seroclinix Delaware’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 42); (2) allow 23 Plaintiff to file a Fourth Amended Complaint; (3) allow Defendants to file a Third-Party 24 Complaint; and (4) extend the time for Defendants to file an Answer to the Fourth 25 Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 56.) 26 “In general, a court should liberally allow a party to amend its pleading.” Sonoma 27 Cty. Ass’n of Retired Emps. v. Sonoma Cty., 708 F.3d 1109, 1117 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing 28 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)); see also Owens v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 244 F.3d 708, (9th Cir. 2001) (“A district court shall grant leave to amend freely when justice so 2 requires.””). Further, a party may amend its pleading without a court order where the 3 opposing party consents in writing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). 4 Here, in light of the broad policy favoring amendments to pleadings and the parties’ 5 || Joint Motion, which reflects Defendants’ consent, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion. 6 Consequently, the pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 42) is 7 || TERMINATED as moot. The Court further ORDERS as follows: 8 1. Plaintiff Integrity shall file its Fourth Amended Complaint no later than 9 Thursday, January 30, 2025. 10 2. Defendants shall file an Answer to Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint no 1 later than Thursday, February 6, 2025. 12 3. Defendants shall file their Third-Party Complaint no later than Thursday, 13 January 30, 2025. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 / . 16 | DATED: January 23, 2025 asf dg aphan 6 17 United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 +4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC v. Seroclinix Corporation, (S.D. Cal. 2025).

Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC v. Seroclinix Corporation (Integrity Medical Product Solutions, LLC v. Seroclinix Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related