Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority

849 N.E.2d 960, 6 N.Y.3d 883
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 9, 2006
StatusPublished

This text of 849 N.E.2d 960 (Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 849 N.E.2d 960, 6 N.Y.3d 883 (N.Y. 2006).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The New York State Liquor Authority, acting within its statutory authority (see Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 107-a [2]), rationally disapproved the brand label registration applications (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 230-231 [1974]; see also Matter of Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v State Liq. Auth., 24 NY2d 31, 39-40 [1969]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. State Liquor Authority
246 N.E.2d 518 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
849 N.E.2d 960, 6 N.Y.3d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/integrated-beverage-group-ltd-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-ny-2006.