Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority

849 N.E.2d 960, 6 N.Y.3d 883

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 2006·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The New York State Liquor Authority, acting within its statutory authority (see Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 107-a [2]), rationally disapproved the brand label registration applications (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 230-231 [1974]; see also Matter of Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v State Liq. Auth., 24 NY2d 31, 39-40 [1969]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The New York State Liquor Authority, acting within its statutory authority (see Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 107-a [2]), rationally disapproved the brand label registration applications (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 230-231 [1974]; see also Matter of Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v State Liq. Auth., 24 NY2d 31, 39-40 [1969]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 849 N.E.2d 960, 6 N.Y.3d 883 (N.Y. 2006).

Pincite

849 N.E.2d 960 (Integrated Beverage Group Ltd. v. New York State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related