Integrated Administrators v. Valdes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Integrated Administrators v. Valdes

865 So. 2d 7, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18007, 2003 WL 22768428

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 25, 2003

DocketNo. 1D02-4026

StatusPublished

This text of 865 So. 2d 7 (Integrated Administrators v. Valdes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Integrated Administrators v. Valdes, 865 So. 2d 7, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18007, 2003 WL 22768428 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the final order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) which granted Appellee’s claim for permanent total disability (PTD) benefits. Relit-igation of the issue of Appellee’s entitlement to PTD benefits was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. See Nelson & Co. v. Holtzclaw, 566 So.2d 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Moreover, Appellee did not demonstrate a change in condition or a mistake of fact which would warrant modification of the previous order denying his claim for PTD benefits. See Alachua County Adult Det. Ctr. v. Alford, 727 So.2d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the JCC’s order granting PTD benefits, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BARFIELD, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the final order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) which granted Appellee’s claim for permanent total disability (PTD) benefits. Relit-igation of the issue of Appellee’s entitlement to PTD benefits was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. See Nelson & Co. v. Holtzclaw, 566 So.2d 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Moreover, Appellee did not demonstrate a change in condition or a mistake of fact which would warrant modification of the previous order denying his claim for PTD benefits. See Alachua County Adult Det. Ctr. v. Alford, 727 So.2d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the JCC’s order granting PTD benefits, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BARFIELD, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

865 So. 2d 7, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18007, 2003 WL 22768428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/integrated-administrators-v-valdes-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack