Integrale Investments, LLC v. Hoffman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Integrale Investments, LLC v. Hoffman

210 So. 3d 251, 2017 WL 535405, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1670

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 2017

DocketCase No. 2D15-5757

StatusPublished

This text of 210 So. 3d 251 (Integrale Investments, LLC v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Integrale Investments, LLC v. Hoffman, 210 So. 3d 251, 2017 WL 535405, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1670 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

Pursuant to East Avenue, LLC v. Insignia Bank, 136 So.3d 659, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), we quash the trial court’s partial final judgment.

The trial court issued an order granting partial final judgment. The order reserves jurisdiction to decide an interrelated claim in the complaint. Yet, the order allows execution to issue.

“Permitting execution prior to completion of the litigation before the trial court has long been characterized as improper by the appellate courts.” Id. Because the order is a nonfinal, nonappealable order but authorizes execution, it departs from the essential requirements of law. Id.

Petition for writ of certiorari granted; judgment quashed.

WALLACE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI