Integral Assist Med., P.C. v. Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co.
This text of Integral Assist Med., P.C. v. Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co. (Integral Assist Med., P.C. v. Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Tri-State Consumer Insurance Company, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the District Court of Suffolk County, Third District (C. Stephen Hackeling, J.), dated April 30, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the District Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There is no merit to plaintiff's argument on appeal that defendant "clearly took an adversarial position" during claims processing in violation of 11 NYCRR 65-3.2 (b).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
Marano, P.J., Garguilo and Brands, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: January 20, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Integral Assist Med., P.C. v. Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/integral-assist-med-pc-v-tri-state-consumer-ins-co-nyappterm-2017.