Integon National Insurance Company v. Hutsell

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedApril 23, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-00490
StatusUnknown

This text of Integon National Insurance Company v. Hutsell (Integon National Insurance Company v. Hutsell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Integon National Insurance Company v. Hutsell, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE Case No.: 1:20-cv-00490 NONE JLT COMPANY., 12 ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION AS TO THE Plaintiff, MENDIBURU MAGIC FOUNDATION 13 AGAINST CANCER v. 14 (Doc. 9) MICHAEL DAUSTER., et al., 15 Defendants.

18 The plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal with prejudice as to The Mendiburu Magic 19 Foundation Against Cancer (Doc. 9). This defendant has not appeared in the action. Thus, according to 20 Fed. R. Civ.P. 41, the dismissal is effective without an order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 21 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this 22 action as to The Mendiburu Magic Foundation Against Cancer only. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated: April 23, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Integon National Insurance Company v. Hutsell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/integon-national-insurance-company-v-hutsell-caed-2020.