Integon Life Insurance v. Business Futures Planning Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Integon Life Insurance v. Business Futures Planning Corp.

277 S.E.2d 481, 276 S.C. 215, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 356

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 23, 1981·No. 21218-A·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant Integon Life Insurance Corporation appeals from orders of the circuit court judge (1) denying its motion for default judgment against respondents Business Futures Planning Corporation, Richard C. Browy, Patricia Browy and Carolina Business Advisors, Inc., and (2) granting the motion of respondents Richard C. Browy, Patricia Browy and Carolina Business Advisors, Inc. for leave to file responsive pleadings. We initially remanded this matter to the [216] trial court with the direction that the order rendered be amended to show what findings had been made. See 266 S.E. (2d) 81 (S.C.1980); Opinion No. 21218, filed 5/5/80. Our remand order has been complied with. Having carefully reviewed the record and briefs submitted we find no error of law. Johnson v. Finger, 102 S. C. 354, 86 S. E. 673 (1915); Savage v. Cannon, 204 S.C. 473, 30 S.E. (2d) 70 (1944). Since a full opinion would be without precedential value, we affirm pursuant to our Rule 23.

Affirmed.

Lewis, C. J., and Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory and Har-well, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Appellant Integon Life Insurance Corporation appeals from orders of the circuit court judge (1) denying its motion for default judgment against respondents Business Futures Planning Corporation, Richard C. Browy, Patricia Browy and Carolina Business Advisors, Inc., and (2) granting the motion of respondents Richard C. Browy, Patricia Browy and Carolina Business Advisors, Inc. for leave to file responsive pleadings. We initially remanded this matter to the [216] trial court with the direction that the order rendered be amended to show what findings had been made. See 266 S.E. (2d) 81 (S.C.1980); Opinion No. 21218, filed 5/5/80. Our remand order has been complied with. Having carefully reviewed the record and briefs submitted we find no error of law. Johnson v. Finger, 102 S. C. 354, 86 S. E. 673 (1915); Savage v. Cannon, 204 S.C. 473, 30 S.E. (2d) 70 (1944). Since a full opinion would be without precedential value, we affirm pursuant to our Rule 23.

Affirmed.

Lewis, C. J., and Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory and Har-well, JJ., concur.

Integon Life Insurance v. Business Futures Planning Corp., 277 S.E.2d 481, 276 S.C. 215, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 356 (S.C. 1981).

Pincite

277 S.E.2d 481 (Integon Life Insurance v. Business Futures Planning Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related