Intcomex Holdings, LLC v. Grant Thornton International

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Intcomex Holdings, LLC v. Grant Thornton International

933 So. 2d 1155, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6515, 2006 WL 1195850

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 2006·No. No. 3D05-1628·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court’s decision to dismiss Appellant’s second amended complaint for forum non conveniens did not constitute a “clear abuse of discretion.” See Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 257, 102 S.Ct. 252, 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981). “[W]here the [trial] court has considered all relevant public and private interest factors, and where its balancing of these factors is reasonable, its decision deserves substantial deference.” Id.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find that the trial court’s decision to dismiss Appellant’s second amended complaint for forum non conveniens did not constitute a “clear abuse of discretion.” See Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 257, 102 S.Ct. 252, 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981). “[W]here the [trial] court has considered all relevant public and private interest factors, and where its balancing of these factors is reasonable, its decision deserves substantial deference.” Id.

Affirmed.

Intcomex Holdings, LLC v. Grant Thornton International, 933 So. 2d 1155, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6515, 2006 WL 1195850 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

933 So. 2d 1155 (Intcomex Holdings, LLC v. Grant Thornton International) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related