Intasys Corp. v. Hodges

726 So. 2d 338, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1999 WL 18163
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1999·No. No. 98-2038·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Quinto de Garcia, 489 So.2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 496 So.2d 143 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090, 107 S.Ct. 1299, 94 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Intasys Corp. v. Hodges, 726 So. 2d 338, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1999 WL 18163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

726 So. 2d 338 (Intasys Corp. v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Garber
726 So. 2d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)