Intasys Corp. v. Hodges

726 So. 2d 338, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1999 WL 18163
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2038
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 726 So. 2d 338 (Intasys Corp. v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Intasys Corp. v. Hodges, 726 So. 2d 338, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1999 WL 18163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Quinto de Garcia, 489 So.2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 496 So.2d 143 (Fla.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090, 107 S.Ct. 1299, 94 L.Ed.2d 155 (1987).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Garber
726 So. 2d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
726 So. 2d 338, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, 1999 WL 18163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intasys-corp-v-hodges-fladistctapp-1999.