Insured Lloyds v. Ranger County Mutual Insurance

212 So. 2d 255, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4756
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 18, 1968·No. No. 2308·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FRUGÉ, Judge.

For the reasons given in Wallace M. Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Company, Clifton Auzenne, Clarence Batiste, Ranger County Mutual Insurance Company and Melvin Steely, 212 So.2d 246 (La.App.3d Cir., 1968), No. 2307 on our docket, consolidated herewith for trial purposes, the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed at appellants’ costs.

Affirmed.

HOOD, J., concurs for the reasons assigned in his dissenting opinion in Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Co., 212 So.2d 246.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Insured Lloyds v. Ranger County Mutual Insurance, 212 So. 2d 255, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4756 (La. Ct. App. 1968).

212 So. 2d 255 (Insured Lloyds v. Ranger County Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Co.
212 So. 2d 246 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1968)