Insurasource, Inc. v. Cowles & Connell of New York, Inc.

467 F. App'x 337
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 11, 2012·No. 11-60672·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

We affirm the well-reasoned opinion of the district court, dismissing this case for lack of personal jurisdiction.

With respect to the financing agreements, John A. Rocco, Incorporated, was not an agent of the appellees, and Rocco’s conduct is therefore not attributable to the appellees. With respect to the insurance agreements, the appellees did not make any contracts with a resident of Mississippi, commit any torts in Mississippi, or otherwise do business in Mississippi. Instead, the appellees sold insurance to New Jersey insureds.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5m Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Insurasource, Inc. v. Cowles & Connell of New York, Inc., 467 F. App'x 337 (5th Cir. 2012).

467 F. App'x 337 (Insurasource, Inc. v. Cowles & Connell of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Trinity Capital Corp. v. Catlin Specialty Insurance
990 F. Supp. 2d 642 (S.D. Mississippi, 2013)