Insurance Corp. of America v. State, Department of Insurance & Treasurer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Insurance Corp. of America v. State, Department of Insurance & Treasurer

509 So. 2d 1235, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1652, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9237

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1987

DocketNo. 87-0421

StatusPublished

This text of 509 So. 2d 1235 (Insurance Corp. of America v. State, Department of Insurance & Treasurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Insurance Corp. of America v. State, Department of Insurance & Treasurer, 509 So. 2d 1235, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1652, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9237 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an injunction precluding appellants from transacting the business of insurance in the State. The parties dispute whether the injunction is temporary or permanent on its face. The State contends that the injunction is permanent, and that an evidentiary hearing has been held. However, the order makes no findings and makes no reference to the hearing, which apparently had been noticed only as a hearing for a temporary injunction. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings and for findings should the trial court determine that the injunction should be continued. See Seashore Club of Atlantic City, Inc. v. Tessler, 405 So.2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The existing injunction shall remain in force as a temporary injunction for a period [1236]*1236of 60 days or entry of a new injunction, whichever occurs first.

LETTS, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an injunction precluding appellants from transacting the business of insurance in the State. The parties dispute whether the injunction is temporary or permanent on its face. The State contends that the injunction is permanent, and that an evidentiary hearing has been held. However, the order makes no findings and makes no reference to the hearing, which apparently had been noticed only as a hearing for a temporary injunction. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings and for findings should the trial court determine that the injunction should be continued. See Seashore Club of Atlantic City, Inc. v. Tessler, 405 So.2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The existing injunction shall remain in force as a temporary injunction for a period [1236]*1236of 60 days or entry of a new injunction, whichever occurs first.

LETTS, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 So. 2d 1235, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1652, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/insurance-corp-of-america-v-state-department-of-insurance-treasurer-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack