Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Ray Ahlers

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 2008
Docket13-08-00102-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Ray Ahlers (Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Ray Ahlers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Ray Ahlers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-08-102-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________________

INSURANCE COMPANY

OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellant,



v.



RAY AHLERS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, and appellee, Ray Ahlers, have filed an agreed motion to reverse the trial court's judgment, remand the cause, and accelerate the mandate. The parties further ask that this Court tax the costs of appeal against the party incurring same. According to the motion, the parties have now resolved the issues presented in this appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to reverse and remand and accelerate the mandate, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). The agreed motion is GRANTED, and the trial court's judgment is REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED for further proceedings.

We direct the Clerk of this Court to issue the mandate contemporaneously with this opinion. See id. 18.1(c) (modifying the time for issuance of mandate "if the parties so agree, or for good cause on the motion of a party."). Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, costs will be taxed against the party incurring same. See id. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 27th day of March, 2008.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Ray Ahlers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/insurance-company-of-the-state-of-pennsylvania-v-r-texapp-2008.