Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Merle A. Hughes
This text of Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Merle A. Hughes (Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Merle A. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-12-00414-CV
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant v.
MERLE A. HUGHES, Appellee
From the County Court at Law Hill County, Texas Trial Court No. 46131
MEDIATION ORDER
The Legislature has provided for the resolution of disputes through alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) procedures. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.001-
154.073 (West 2005). The policy behind ADR is stated in the statute: “It is the policy of
this state to encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes . . . and the early settlement
of pending litigation through voluntary settlement procedures.” Id. § 154.002 (West
2005). Mediation is a form of ADR. Mediation is a mandatory but non-binding settlement conference, conducted with the assistance of a mediator. Mediation is
private, confidential, and privileged.
We find that this appeal is appropriate for mediation. See id. § 154.021(a) (West
2005); 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 9.
The parties are ordered to confer and attempt to agree upon a mediator. Within
fourteen days after the date of this Order, Jes Alexander is ordered to file a notice with
the Clerk of this Court which either identifies the agreed-upon mediator or states that
the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator. If the notice states that the parties are
unable to agree upon a mediator, this Court will assign a mediator.
Mediation must occur within thirty days after the date the above-referenced
notice agreeing to a mediator is filed or, if no mediator is agreed upon, within thirty
days after the date of the order assigning a mediator.
No less than seven calendar days before the first scheduled mediation session,
each party must provide the mediator and all other parties with an information sheet
setting forth the party’s positions about the issues that need to be resolved. At or before
the first session, all parties must produce all information necessary for the mediator to
understand the issues presented. The mediator may require any party to supplement
the information required by this Order.
Named parties must be present during the entire mediation process.
Immediately after mediation, the mediator must advise this Court, in writing,
only that the case did or did not settle and the amount of the mediator’s fee paid by
each party. The mediator’s fees will be taxed as costs. Unless the mediator agrees to
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Hughes Page 2 mediate without fee, the mediator must negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, and
the parties must each pay one-half of the agreed-upon fee directly to the mediator.
Failure or refusal to attend the mediation as scheduled may result in the
imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law.
In the docketing statement, Appellant Insurance Company of the State of
Pennsylvania states that the appeal should not be referred to mediation because the
Labor Code and TDI Rules prohibit the compromise of such claims. We note that the
Labor Code provides:
(a) A claim or issue may not be settled contrary to the provisions of the appeals panel decision issued on the claim or issue unless a party to the proceeding has filed for judicial review under this subchapter or Subchapter G. The trial court must approve a settlement made by the parties after judicial review of an award is sought and before the court enters judgment.
TEX. LABOR CODE ANN. § 410.256 (a) (West 2006). We do not find a provision
prohibiting a referral to mediation after the trial court has entered a judgment.
Any objection to this Order must be filed with this Court and served upon all
parties within ten days after the date of this Order, or it is waived.
We refer this appeal to mediation.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed November 7, 2013 Do not publish
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Hughes Page 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Merle A. Hughes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/insurance-company-of-the-state-of-pennsylvania-v-m-texapp-2013.