Insurance Company of North America v. Carl T. Howe
This text of 179 F.2d 239 (Insurance Company of North America v. Carl T. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;
And it appearing that the questions of fact involved were submitted to the jury under appropriate instructions pertaining thereto, compare Myers v. John Hancock Mut. Life Insurance Co., 108 Ohio St. 175, 181 through 183, 140 N.E. 504, that the verdict of the jury is amply supported by the evidence, and that there is no prejudicial error in the rulings of the trial judge or in his instructions to the jury;
It is therefore ordered that the judgment •of the District Court be and is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 F.2d 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/insurance-company-of-north-america-v-carl-t-howe-ca6-1949.