Insurance Company of North America v. Carl T. Howe

179 F.2d 239
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1949
Docket10919
StatusPublished

This text of 179 F.2d 239 (Insurance Company of North America v. Carl T. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Insurance Company of North America v. Carl T. Howe, 179 F.2d 239 (6th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And it appearing that the questions of fact involved were submitted to the jury under appropriate instructions pertaining thereto, compare Myers v. John Hancock Mut. Life Insurance Co., 108 Ohio St. 175, 181 through 183, 140 N.E. 504, that the verdict of the jury is amply supported by the evidence, and that there is no prejudicial error in the rulings of the trial judge or in his instructions to the jury;

It is therefore ordered that the judgment •of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myers v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co.
140 N.E. 504 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 F.2d 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/insurance-company-of-north-america-v-carl-t-howe-ca6-1949.