Insurance Co. of North America v. Haack/Crawford & Associates Architects/Engineers/Planners, Inc.

480 So. 2d 1335, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2512, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16584
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1985·No. No. 84-2408·Published

Opinion

BARKETT, Judge.

We find that the appellees are beneficiaries of the insurance policy purchased by the owners pursuant to the requirement of the construction contract between the owner and contractor. Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment on the authority of U.S. Fire Insurance Company v. Norlin Industries, Inc., 428 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and Housing Investment Corporation v. Carris, 389 So.2d 689 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), for the reasons set forth in the companion decision, Insurance Company of North America v. E.L. Nezelek, Inc., 480 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) issued simultaneously herewith.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Insurance Co. of North America v. Haack/Crawford & Associates Architects/Engineers/Planners, Inc., 480 So. 2d 1335, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2512, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16584 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

480 So. 2d 1335 (Insurance Co. of North America v. Haack/Crawford & Associates Architects/Engineers/Planners, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ins. Co. of North America v. EL NEZELEK
480 So. 2d 1333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Housing Inv. Corp. v. Carris
389 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
US Fire Ins. Co. v. Norlin Industries, Inc.
428 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)