Institute for Trend Research v. United States

230 F.2d 611, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3298
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 1956
Docket5080
StatusPublished

This text of 230 F.2d 611 (Institute for Trend Research v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Institute for Trend Research v. United States, 230 F.2d 611, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3298 (1st Cir. 1956).

Opinion

230 F.2d 611

56-1 USTC P 9382

INSTITUTE FOR TREND RESEARCH, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 5080.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

March 16, 1956.

Robert H. Reno, Concord, N.H., with whom Orr & Reno, Concord, N.H., was on brief, for appellant.

Louise Foster, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Charles K. Rice, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Maurice Bois, U.S. Atty., Concord, N.H., were on brief for appellee.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 F.2d 611, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/institute-for-trend-research-v-united-states-ca1-1956.