Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. v. Newberry

193 So. 2d 23
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 9, 1966·No. No. 265·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the record-on-appeal and the respective briefs of the parties and find that the appellant has failed to show reversible error.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, Acting C. J., and LILES, 'WOODIE A., and NANCE, L. CLAY'TON, Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. v. Newberry, 193 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

193 So. 2d 23 (Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. v. Newberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Smith
193 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)