Instance v. On Serts Systems, Inc.
This text of 988 F.2d 129 (Instance v. On Serts Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
David J. INSTANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ON SERTS SYSTEMS, INC., A Canadian Corporation, and Longford
Equipment International, Ltd., a Canadian
Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
v.
CCL PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION, INC. a/k/a CCL Label, Interested
Party-Appellee.
No. 92-1399.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 11, 1993.
On Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota, in Case No(s). CIV 92-4073.
D.S.D.
AFFIRMED.
Before RICH, LOURIE and SCHALL, Circuit Judges:
Judgment
PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
988 F.2d 129, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 696, 1993 WL 4776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/instance-v-on-serts-systems-inc-cafc-1993.