Insley v. Garside

123 F. 78, 59 C.C.A. 256, 2 Alaska Fed. 163, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 3974
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 29, 1903·No. No. 829·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a rehearing is denied, but it is ordered that the concluding portion of the decree of this court (121 F. 699) be modified to read as follows: “On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded to the said District Court for further proceedings, and with instructions to give effect to the proof of the appellees as a claim proven in the name of Caroline Sharick; the appellees to be subrogated to her rights thereunder only upon proof of their payment to her of the sum payable thereon out of the bankrupt estate.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Insley v. Garside, 123 F. 78, 59 C.C.A. 256, 2 Alaska Fed. 163, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 3974 (9th Cir. 1903).

123 F. 78 (Insley v. Garside) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Miller
105 F.2d 926 (Second Circuit, 1939)
United States v. Burke
105 F.2d 926 (Second Circuit, 1939)