Insky v. Machat

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Insky v. Machat

35 Misc. 827, 72 N.Y.S. 1108

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 827 (Insky v. Machat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Insky v. Machat, 35 Misc. 827, 72 N.Y.S. 1108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The infirmity in the trial, whereof this judgment is the result, is that there is no proof that defendant ever satisfied the, debt, after having reached majority. The only evidence is that he made a promise to one Schwartz in the summer of 1900. The defendant was born June 5, 1879, so the promise may have been made prior to June 5, 1900.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The infirmity in the trial, whereof this judgment is the result, is that there is no proof that defendant ever satisfied the, debt, after having reached majority. The only evidence is that he made a promise to one Schwartz in the summer of 1900. The defendant was born June 5, 1879, so the promise may have been made prior to June 5, 1900.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 827, 72 N.Y.S. 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/insky-v-machat-nyappterm-1901.