Inserra v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS & PROF. REG.
12 So. 3d 931
This text of 12 So. 3d 931 (Inserra v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS & PROF. REG.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Inserra v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS & PROF. REG., 12 So. 3d 931 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
Frank D. INSERRA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Frank D. Inserra, Miramar, pro se.
Garnett W. Chisenhall, Chief Appellate Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Conklin v. Dep't of Revenue, 684 So.2d 328, 331 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
GROSS, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
CONKLIN SHOWS v. Department of Revenue
684 So. 2d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 So. 3d 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inserra-v-dept-of-business-prof-reg-fladistctapp-2009.