Inserra v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS & PROF. REG.

12 So. 3d 931

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 22, 2009·No. 4D08-2402·Published

Opinion

12 So.3d 931 (2009)

Frank D. INSERRA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.

No. 4D08-2402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 22, 2009.

Frank D. Inserra, Miramar, pro se.

Garnett W. Chisenhall, Chief Appellate Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Conklin v. Dep't of Revenue, 684 So.2d 328, 331 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

GROSS, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

12 So.3d 931 (2009)

Frank D. INSERRA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.

No. 4D08-2402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 22, 2009.

Frank D. Inserra, Miramar, pro se.

Garnett W. Chisenhall, Chief Appellate Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Conklin v. Dep't of Revenue, 684 So.2d 328, 331 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

GROSS, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Inserra v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS & PROF. REG., 12 So. 3d 931 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

12 So. 3d 931 (Inserra v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS & PROF. REG.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CONKLIN SHOWS v. Department of Revenue

684 So. 2d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)