Inquiry Concerning a Judge Re Alley

699 So. 2d 1369, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 640, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1519, 1997 WL 619663
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 1997
Docket90691
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 699 So. 2d 1369 (Inquiry Concerning a Judge Re Alley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inquiry Concerning a Judge Re Alley, 699 So. 2d 1369, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 640, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1519, 1997 WL 619663 (Fla. 1997).

Opinion

699 So.2d 1369 (1997)

In re INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE, No. 97-01 re Nancy F. ALLEY.

No. 90691.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 9, 1997.

Thomas C. MacDonald, Jr., General Counsel for the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, Tampa, for petitioner.

Richard C. McFarlain of McFarlain, Wiley, Cassedy & Jones, P.A., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We review the recommendation of the Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC) that Circuit Judge Nancy F. Alley be disciplined by receiving a public reprimand. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, section 12 of the Florida Constitution.

The Respondent was served with a Notice of Formal Proceedings by the Investigative Panel of the JQC alleging that during the campaign for Circuit Judge of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit in the summer of 1996:

1. Alley knowingly misrepresented her qualifications and those of her opponent, in newspaper advertisements, by claiming: (a) to have circuit judicial experience, when in fact her service was that of a general master; and (b) that her opponent had no circuit judicial experience, when in fact she had extensive experience as a county judge who had been assigned to the circuit court;

2. Alley knowingly did the following in campaign mailers: (a) misrepresented her qualifications and those of her opponent; (b) injected party politics into a non-partisan election, by noting the party affiliation of the governor who had appointed her opponent to her position of county judge (when in fact both Alley and her opponent were members of the same political party, which was different from that of the governor); (c) improperly included a photograph of her opponent sitting next to a criminal defendant noting that her opponent "defend[ed] convicted mass murderer, cop killer, William Cruse," when at the time of the photograph Cruse had not been convicted and her opponent was an assistant public defender observing a duty placed on her as a member of The Florida Bar; and (d) improperly included a portion of a newspaper editorial which falsely implied that Alley, not her opponent, had been endorsed by the newspaper.

The Respondent filed an answer admitting all the allegations and acknowledging that as a "candidate for judicial office [she] must exercise the most disciplined restraint upon the activities of her campaign." She further asserted that she had "learned a great lesson and has been deeply sensitized to the need for judges and judicial candidates to show judicial demeanor and restraint when they are required to run in a contested campaign." The Respondent further filed a waiver of a formal hearing before the Hearing Panel of the JQC.

The Investigative Panel concluded that the behavior of the Respondent constituted conduct unbecoming a member of the judiciary or a candidate for judicial office. The panel further indicated that the advertising violations were "very serious because they present significant impediments to an orderly and truthful electoral process, and because they *1370 raise serious questions of personal and professional integrity." However, in view of the response of the Respondent, which the panel found to be sincere, the panel, on behalf of the JQC, concluded "that the interests of justice and of the public welfare are adequately served by administration of a public reprimand."

We agree with the JQC that Alley's actions were improper. However, we find it difficult to allow one guilty of such egregious conduct to retain the benefits of those violations and remain in office. Yet, we are constrained by the JQC's recommendation.[1] Accordingly, we hereby command Judge Nancy F. Alley to appear before this Court for the administration of a public reprimand at 9 a.m. on November 3, 1997, for the actions noted above.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] We note that in 1996, Article V, section 12 of the Florida Constitution was amended to allow the Supreme Court to modify the recommendations of the JQC.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Florida Bar v. Bryon R. Aven
Supreme Court of Florida, 2021
Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 16-534 Re: Dana Marie Santino
257 So. 3d 25 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 16-377 Re: Scott C. DuPont
252 So. 3d 1130 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Nos. 08-392 & 08-360 re Dempsey
29 So. 3d 1030 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
In Re Dempsey
29 So. 3d 1030 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 02-466, re Renke
933 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
In Re Renke
933 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge re Diaz
908 So. 2d 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
In Re Diaz
908 So. 2d 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
In Re Pando
903 So. 2d 902 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, re Angel
867 So. 2d 379 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
In Re Angel
867 So. 2d 379 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
In Re Kinsey
842 So. 2d 77 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 99-09, re Kinsey
842 So. 2d 77 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Nos. 99-10 & 00-17
797 So. 2d 560 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
In Re McMillan
797 So. 2d 560 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 98-347, re Schwartz
755 So. 2d 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
In Re Schwartz
755 So. 2d 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
In Re Wood
720 So. 2d 506 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 So. 2d 1369, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 640, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1519, 1997 WL 619663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inquiry-concerning-a-judge-re-alley-fla-1997.