Inquiry Concerning a Judge Marko

595 So. 2d 46, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 472
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1992
Docket79247
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 595 So. 2d 46 (Inquiry Concerning a Judge Marko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inquiry Concerning a Judge Marko, 595 So. 2d 46, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 472 (Fla. 1992).

Opinion

595 So.2d 46 (1992)

Inquiry Concerning a Judge, re Paul M. MARKO, III.

No. 79247.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 12, 1992.

J. Klein Wigginton, Chairman and Roy T. Rhodes, General Counsel, Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Richard C. McFarlain of McFarlain, Sternstein, Wiley & Cassedy, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We are called upon to enter an appropriate order in a disciplinary matter regarding a judge. We have jurisdiction under article V, section 12, Florida Constitution. The judge, Paul M. Marko, III, and the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission have entered into a written stipulation recommending a public reprimand. We approve the stipulation which contains the findings of the Commission, in pertinent part, as follows:

1. You have conducted yourself in a manner designed to lessen public confidence in the dignity, integrity and impartiality of the judiciary, in violation of Canons 1, 2, 3 A(2) and 3 A(3) of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
2. You have exhibited rude, improper and inappropriate behavior at a dissolution of marriage hearing in Price v. Price, in that you used inappropriate language when you remarked to the wife to "... go out and get another guy ... the single bars are full of them ... there are all kinds of bimbos in those places, and there are all kinds of guys running around in open shirts with eagles on their chests. There are great guys out there ... you go find a brain surgeon."

In the stipulation Judge Marko regrets and apologizes for his conduct. No one suggests that Judge Marko is presently unfit to serve as a judge.

By publication of this opinion, Judge Marko is reprimanded for the events described above.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Eiler
169 Wash. 2d 340 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Eiler
236 P.3d 873 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 06-249 re Allen
998 So. 2d 557 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
In Re Allen
998 So. 2d 557 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 98-347, re Schwartz
755 So. 2d 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
In Re Schwartz
755 So. 2d 110 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
In Re Wood
720 So. 2d 506 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
595 So. 2d 46, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inquiry-concerning-a-judge-marko-fla-1992.