Inquiry Commission v. Stevenson

993 S.W.2d 504, 1999 Ky. LEXIS 78
CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 1999
DocketNo. 99-SC-322-KB
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 993 S.W.2d 504 (Inquiry Commission v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inquiry Commission v. Stevenson, 993 S.W.2d 504, 1999 Ky. LEXIS 78 (Ky. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION

Pursuant to SCR 3.165(l)(a) and SCR 3.165(l)(b), on April 5, 1999, the Inquiry Tribunal of the Kentucky Bar Association filed a petition for temporary suspension against respondent, Robert Michael Stevenson, of 4809 Bardstown Road, Louisville, KY 40291. An order directing respondent to show cause why he should not be suspended was entered on April 6,1999. No response has been filed by respondent or anyone on his behalf.

This Court concludes that reasonable cause exists to believe that respondent has misappropriated funds held for others to his own use, in violation of SCR 3.130-1.15(a) and SCR 3.130-8.3(c). It further appears from the record that reasonable cause exists to believe that unless such an order is entered, a real and present danger exists to the public should respondent be permitted to continue to practice law.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent, Robert Michael Stevenson, be and is hereby temporarily suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

1.Within twenty (20) days from the date of entry of this order of suspension, respondents shall notify all clients in writing of his inability to continue to represent them.

2. The temporary suspension of respondent shall be effective with the entry of this order and shall continue in effect until such time as the merits of this disciplinary proceeding can be finally determined by this Court in accordance with SCR 3.370 or SCR 3.480 or until such time as respondent can show good cause why the order of temporary suspension should be amended or dissolved.

3. Such portion of this proceeding as contained in this order shall be deemed a matter of public record at this time. All other portions shall be afforded the confidentiality required under SCR 3.150 unless otherwise directed by this Court.

4. Respondent shall pay the costs of the proceeding.

All concur.

ENTERED: June 17,1999.

/s/ Joseph E. Lambert CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Stevenson
11 S.W.3d 43 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
993 S.W.2d 504, 1999 Ky. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inquiry-commission-v-stevenson-ky-1999.