Inquiry Commission v. Orr

336 S.W.3d 458, 2011 Ky. LEXIS 59, 2011 WL 1620597
CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedApril 21, 2011
Docket2011-SC-000010-KB
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 336 S.W.3d 458 (Inquiry Commission v. Orr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inquiry Commission v. Orr, 336 S.W.3d 458, 2011 Ky. LEXIS 59, 2011 WL 1620597 (Ky. 2011).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

MINTON, Chief Judge.

The Inquiry Commission moves this Court to enter an order temporarily sus *459 pending Jimmie Green Orr, Jr., from the practice of law and restricting him from dealing in client funds. SCR 3.165(7 )(a), (l )(b), (2). Orr, whose KBA number is 85305 and whose last known bar roster address is 200 Southland Drive, Lexington, Kentucky 40503, was admitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on October 17,1994.

KBA File 17573

Orr began representing Bethel Slone in 2000 and was granted power of attorney in 2008. Acting in this capacity, Orr sold Slone’s principal asset, a twenty-five percent interest in DEVCO Inc., a closely held family-owned corporation, for $138,500.00. Before completing the transaction, the purchaser required Slone provide affidavits from each of her three adult children swearing they did not oppose the sale. Three such affidavits were produced and the sale was completed in the summer of 2008. Orr maintains he mailed the affidavits to Slone and she returned them, complete with signatures. However, Slone swore by affidavit that she had never before seen the affidavits allegedly signed by her children and had no knowledge of who actually signed the affidavits. Additionally, Slone’s daughter, Ruth Ann Willis, claims she and her siblings did not sign the affidavits and knew nothing about the sale, which they would have opposed as not in their mother’s best interest. Orr admits he notarized each affidavit, despite the fact that he did not witness the signatures and his notary commission had expired.

Orr deposited the $138,500.00 sale proceeds into his escrow account, from which he then transferred $75,000.00 to a money market account in Slone’s name and loaned $58,500.00 to “Robert H. Cowan, LHC Properties, LLC.” Cowan signed a Promissory Note and a Promissory Note Guarantee Agreement on September 3, 2008. Orr also signed a Promissory Note Guarantee Agreement the same day. Orr said he loaned Cowan the money because he thought it was a good investment for Slone and he had known Cowan, who was in the business of buying and flipping homes, for quite some time. According to Orr, he and Cowan met when Orr was in his first semester of an MBA program and reconnected several years later, at which time Orr worked for a food broker and Cowan worked for a cookie or cracker company. The two then stayed in touch until 1991, when Orr began law school. Around 2001, they ran into each other at church and remained friends until 2008, when the current events transpired. After completing the loan, Orr had difficulty contacting Co-wan. When it came time for the first payment to Slone in October 2008, Orr discovered Cowan’s phone had been disconnected. When Orr contacted the people at Cowan’s office they claimed to have never heard of Cowan. Consequently, as a guarantor, Orr claims he made the payments himself until Slone was repaid in full, including interest.

Orr maintained his story about Cowan for months during the Bar investigation, embellishing and adding details, until he finally admitted in a September 1, 2010 letter to Bar Counsel that Robert H. Co-wan and LHC Properties, LLC were fictitious. Orr admitted he used money taken from his escrow account to pay personal debts and invented Cowan and LHC Properties to cover his misappropriation of client funds. As of September 1, 2010, Orr claims to have (1) returned the misappropriated funds to Slone, including paying interest on the note; (2) repurchased Slone’s stock, paying from his pocket the premium required by the purchaser; and (3) used his own funds to pay Slone the $5,000.00 quarterly dividend that she would have received for five quarters had he been able to immediately repurchase *460 her stock. It is unclear whether any money is still owed Slone.

The KBA filed a four-count charge against Orr on October 20, 2010, charging him with violating SCR 3.130(8.1)(a) 1 for making numerous false statements of material fact to Bar Counsel regarding the loan to Cowan; SCR 3.130(8.1)(b) for failing to correct the false information he provided Bar Counsel; SCR 3.130(8.4)(b) for committing the criminal acts of falsely completing the jurat on the three affidavits and misappropriating Slone’s funds for his own use; and SCR 3.130(8.4)(c) for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation.

KBA File 14893

In its motion, the Inquiry Commission also incorporates by reference the Trial Commissioner’s amended report in File 14893, recommending Orr be suspended for at least sixty-one days for (1) knowingly filing with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky two certificates of credit counseling that he created and falsified; (2) for failing to disclose the falsity of these certificates in a later motion to the Court; and (3) for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. The Trial Commissioner noted in his report that, prior to this incident, Orr did not have a disciplinary history.

Orr’s response, by counsel, to the Inquiry Commission’s petition for temporary suspension simply states Orr “does not contest the material allegations of the Petition for Temporary Suspension.”

Kentucky Supreme Court Rule 3.165(1) provides an attorney may be temporarily suspended from the practice of law if “(a) it appears that probable cause exists to believe that an attorney is or has been misappropriating funds the attorney holds for others to his/her own use or has been otherwise improperly dealing with said funds; or (b) it appears that probable cause exists to believe that an attorney’s conduct poses a substantial threat of harm to his clients or to the public.” In addition, as part of the temporary suspension, the Court may order the attorney be restricted from dealing with client funds, pursuant to SCR 3.165(2).

While it appears these are the first charges brought against Orr, the Court has ordered temporary suspensions in cases with no disciplinary history and/or cases with few charges. In Inquiry Com’n v. Poole, 4 S.W.3d 139 (Ky.1999), an attorney was temporarily suspended when he wrongfully transferred money from his company’s escrow account into its operating account. In Inquiry Commission v. Sexton, 102 S.W.3d 512, (Ky.2003), the Court temporarily suspended Sexton when, in one instance, he collected a $1,500.00 retainer and failed to represent the client and, in a second instance, when he failed to pay mediation costs for a client, forcing her to pay the $400.00 costs out of pocket. In another case, Inquiry Com’n v. Richardson, 324 S.W.3d 739, 740 (Ky.2010), attorney Richardson was temporarily suspended for using escrow funds to purchase property and pay personal debts. The Court temporarily suspended another attorney when, under one charge, he prepared fraudulent court documents and forged a federal judge’s signature and, under another charge, he failed to take action on his clients’ behalf. Inquiry Com’n v. Smith,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orr v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n
355 S.W.3d 449 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2011)
KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. Orr
350 S.W.3d 427 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 S.W.3d 458, 2011 Ky. LEXIS 59, 2011 WL 1620597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inquiry-commission-v-orr-ky-2011.